On Thu, 2021-02-04 at 21:21 +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote: > On Thu, 2021-02-04 at 20:03 +0100, Frans de Boer wrote: > > On 04/02/2021 16:22, Scott Andrews wrote: > > > > > > On 2/4/21 9:14 AM, Frans de Boer wrote: > > > > The new instructions for compiling file-5.39 in the first > > > > phase, > > > > are > > > > incomplete. As it turns out, you can only compile file when the > > > > configure command is augmented with '--disable-libseccomp'. The > > > > file > > > > $LFS/usr/include/libseccomp/seccomp.h does not exist yet, cause > > > > to > > > > halt compilation with the message that seccomp.h is missing. > > > > > > > > --- Frans. > > > > > > > > > > That should exist as it should have been installed in LFS-10.0 > > > 5.4.1. > > > > > > BTW I am not a fan of the new "building system" as it takes > > > excessive > > > liberties about overwriting things > > > > > > > > No, what is installed is /usr/include/seccomp.h, not the one what > > is > > needed. > > I think this need some clarification on your side: when did you get > that missing include? When compiling the first pass of file (in > build), > or the second pass? > > In the first pass, you depend on what is on the host, it's a "normal" > compilation on host. It may be that seccomp.h is missing on the host, > some -dev or -devel package is not installed. I've never seen that > before.
answering myself: because I've never been compiling "file" on the host... I think the fix introduced by xry111 should cure this. > > In the second pass, you depend on what is in $LFS, and yes seccomp.h > is > installed in 5.4.1 (see last line of the instructions): usr/include > (no /, so relative to the kernel build dir) is copied recursively to > $LFS/usr. > > Pierre > > -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
