On 2021-02-04 15:19 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > I am OK with the changes to omit seccomp, but when building on an LFS > 10.0 system, there were no problems before.
Hi Bruce, On LFS/BLFS if libseccomp.so is installed, /usr/include/seccomp.h would be also installed. But on many commerical distros (Debian or Fedora) libseccomp.so is in "libseccomp" package, but the header is in "libseccomp-devel" package. So someone may install "libseccomp", but not "libseccomp-devel". And, File building system is so stupid that if libseccomp.so exists, it will use libseccomp anyway. Then the build will fail because it can't find the header. -- Xi Ruoyao <xry...@mengyan1223.wang> School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
