Please don't top-post, thank you. On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 09:59:39AM +0200, Vittorio Giovara wrote: > weekly ping :) > as I explained in the first email this patch is not doing the right > thing as the "right thing"(tm) would be to actually crop the resulting > frame to the dimensions specified in the cropping rectangle (tested on > the JM); however this patch takes a saner approach for the current > handling in which the "unusual" cropping values are always ignored and > don't modify the final resolution.
However, your patch breaks FATE. Please address this issue, it cannot be integrated as-is. Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
