Hi, On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 3:59 AM, Vittorio Giovara <[email protected]> wrote: > weekly ping :) > as I explained in the first email this patch is not doing the right thing as > the "right thing"(tm) would be to actually crop the resulting frame to the > dimensions specified in the cropping rectangle (tested on the JM); however > this patch takes a saner approach for the current handling in which the > "unusual" cropping values are always ignored and don't modify the final > resolution.
So this breaks fate-h264-interlace-crop, and not for the better. Before the patch, the values are properly used and the bottom of the image is cropped off. After the patch, the bottom looks like crap. I don't think that's right. Ronald _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
