On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:36:36PM +0000, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 06:33:49PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> >> None of the compiled binaries use any of libpostproc's symbols except
> >> for trivial ones that print version information.  Thus the dependency
> >> yields no benefit and it is preferable to drop it.
> >> ---
> >>  LICENSE    |    2 +-
> >>  Makefile   |    6 ++++--
> >>  cmdutils.c |    2 --
> >>  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > .. ping ..
> 
> We could also simply delete libpostproc.  It sure would deserve it.

That would not be something I would absolutely object against, but could
we please stay with the topic at hand?  This patch can go in while you
get libpostproc deleted or not.  If libpostproc is deleted, it does not
hurt; if it stays it is a vast improvement.

Diego
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to