Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:36:36PM +0000, Måns Rullgård wrote: >> Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 06:33:49PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote: >> >> None of the compiled binaries use any of libpostproc's symbols except >> >> for trivial ones that print version information. Thus the dependency >> >> yields no benefit and it is preferable to drop it. >> >> --- >> >> LICENSE | 2 +- >> >> Makefile | 6 ++++-- >> >> cmdutils.c | 2 -- >> >> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> > >> > .. ping .. >> >> We could also simply delete libpostproc. It sure would deserve it. > > That would not be something I would absolutely object against, but could > we please stay with the topic at hand? This patch can go in while you > get libpostproc deleted or not. If libpostproc is deleted, it does not > hurt; if it stays it is a vast improvement.
I would not call it vast, whatever it is. -- Måns Rullgård [email protected] _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
