Justin Ruggles <[email protected]> writes: > On 12/30/2011 02:26 PM, Justin Ruggles wrote: > >> On 12/30/2011 02:08 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote: >> >>> Derek Buitenhuis <[email protected]> writes: >>> >>>> From: Michael Niedermayer <[email protected]> >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <[email protected]> >>>> --- >>>> libavformat/rawdec.c | 2 +- >>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/libavformat/rawdec.c b/libavformat/rawdec.c >>>> index 3e2dd05..33a0447 100644 >>>> --- a/libavformat/rawdec.c >>>> +++ b/libavformat/rawdec.c >>>> @@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ AVInputFormat ff_latm_demuxer = { >>>> #endif >>>> >>>> #if CONFIG_MJPEG_DEMUXER >>>> -FF_DEF_RAWVIDEO_DEMUXER(mjpeg, "raw MJPEG video", NULL, "mjpg,mjpeg", >>>> CODEC_ID_MJPEG) >>>> +FF_DEF_RAWVIDEO_DEMUXER(mjpeg, "raw MJPEG video", NULL, "mjpg,mjpeg,mpo", >>>> CODEC_ID_MJPEG) >>>> #endif >>> >>> Is this a common filename suffix? Why is it not detected by probing? I >>> don't like the smell of this patch. >> >> >> I found some samples, and the format is not detected by probing. I'm not >> sure why though. >> >> http://www.steves-digicams.com/camera-reviews/fujifilm/finepix-real-3d-w3/sample-photos-122.html > > Also found a spec if someone wants to try to support probing. > > http://www.cipa.jp/english/hyoujunka/kikaku/pdf/DC-007_E.pdf
Looks like the format merits a full demuxer. Treating it as plain MJPEG is certainly wrong. -- Måns Rullgård [email protected] _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
