On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 03:33:23PM +0100, Luca Barbato wrote: > On 09/01/12 14:11, Diego Biurrun wrote: > >We have been sidetracked from the actual contents of the patch to flames > >about the human condition, so it's not surprising that your comment is > >based on that confusion. > > > >My check target is designed to be a convenient shorthand for all compile > >and test targets all at once. Thus when you run "make check" you can > >be sure not to have forgotten whatever obscure extra target may exist > >in the bowels of the build system. > > > >There is no need for renaming. Some tests could be added to fate or > >removed, but that is orthogonal to this patch. > > Possibly the number of targets might be reduced, that said if enough > people find that useful why not, it isn't particularly invasive and > for people used to proper autotools the check target is something > they are already accustomed.
+1 This is minimally invasive and useful. Can we please stop the trolling and just let me push it? Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
