On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 04:04:31PM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote: > On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 03:33:23PM +0100, Luca Barbato wrote: > > On 09/01/12 14:11, Diego Biurrun wrote: > > >We have been sidetracked from the actual contents of the patch to flames > > >about the human condition, so it's not surprising that your comment is > > >based on that confusion. > > > > > >My check target is designed to be a convenient shorthand for all compile > > >and test targets all at once. Thus when you run "make check" you can > > >be sure not to have forgotten whatever obscure extra target may exist > > >in the bowels of the build system. > > > > > >There is no need for renaming. Some tests could be added to fate or > > >removed, but that is orthogonal to this patch. > > > > Possibly the number of targets might be reduced, that said if enough > > people find that useful why not, it isn't particularly invasive and > > for people used to proper autotools the check target is something > > they are already accustomed. > > +1 > > This is minimally invasive and useful. Can we please stop the > trolling and just let me push it?
.. ping .. Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
