On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Justin Ruggles
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On 06/25/2012 05:23 PM, Jason Garrett-Glaser wrote:
>>> +cglobal conv_s16_to_fltp_2ch, 3,4,5, dst0, src, len, dst1
>>> +    lea       lenq, [4*lend]
>>> +    mov      dst1q, [dst0q+gprsize]
>>> +    mov      dst0q, [dst0q        ]
>>> +    add       srcq, lenq
>>> +    add      dst0q, lenq
>>> +    add      dst1q, lenq
>>> +    neg       lenq
>>> +    mova        m4, [pf_s16_inv_scale]
>>> +    ALIGN 16
>>> +.loop:
>>> +%if cpuflag(sse4)
>>> +    pmovsxwd   m0, [srcq+lenq         ]
>>> +    pmovsxwd   m1, [srcq+lenq+mmsize/2]
>>> +%else
>>> +    mova       m1, [srcq+lenq]
>>> +    punpcklwd  m0, m1
>>> +    punpckhwd  m1, m1
>>
>> This definitely looks wrong; m0 hasn't been set to anything.  Did you
>> test this?  Like in another email, I'd suggest using a macro to
>> abstract this.
>
> Yeah, it works. I did make a macro for it, I just forgot to use it here...
>
>>> +    psrad      m0, 16
>>> +    psrad      m1, 16
>
> The uninitialized parts get shifted away there.

It still creates a false dependency that prevents the processor from
OOEing the loop, though, so it should be avoided.

Jason
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to