On 17/03/13 17:43, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 07:59:35AM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>>
>> --- a/configure
>> +++ b/configure
>> @@ -2155,6 +2155,10 @@ case "$toolchain" in
>>          add_cflags  -fthread-sanitizer
>>          add_ldflags -fthread-sanitizer
>>      ;;
>> +    valgrind-memcheck)
> 
> That valgrind is a memory checker is well-known.  I would prefer a name
> that suggests more of a combination with FATE, which is what the option
> does, such as "fate-valgrind" or "valgrind-fate" or just plain "valgrind".

memcheck is the name of the tool in use.

> Why not just add the args to target_exec?

so you can override the valgrind and keep the command line.

> It would seem that fate.texi is a better location for this note.

if we have a toolchain section it should stay there, an hint about it
would do.


lu
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to