On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:33:19AM +0200, wm4 wrote: > On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 01:00:45 +0200 > Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 12:28:56AM +0200, Clément Bœsch wrote: > > > > > > Kieran suggested tonight on #ffmpeg-devel to have a common mailing-list > > > between the two projects to start communicating again in sane terms. > > > > > > The proposition would be a mailing-list where the 2 projects would send > > > the patches that will make API evolutions. So the projects can continue to > > > drop or add codecs & filters without caring about the other, but will try > > > to communicate more about the API, for the sake of our common users. > > > > > > At first, I suggest that won't engage anything from any of the two > > > projects (so we don't end up in a stalled states such as one project > > > trying to block the other), but it could be seen as a way to introduce > > > some common technical ground. > > > > Your use of "engaged" makes my English parser return ENOUNDERSTAND. > > > > > What do you think? > > > > I think or thought that this proposal was mostly a trollbait and discarded > > replying so far, but you appear genuinely convinced that something like > > this is a suitable first, and not - say - seventh, step, so I'll bite. > > > > Often times API additions or changes are discussed on this mailing list. > > You FFmpeg people are all subscribed here; what stops you from replying > > on this mailing list? > > The same thing that stops Anton from making constructive comments on > those "horrible" FFmpeg APIs on the FFmpeg ML,
There's the issue of hostility and personal insults to consider, don't you agree? There are no such things happening here. Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
