On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 10:45:47AM +0300, Martin Storsjö wrote: > On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Diego Biurrun wrote: > > > This can be useful in known-broken scenarios like miscompilation > > by legacy compilers and similar. > > --- > > > > Yeah, one could come up with more elaborate solutions, but this already > > works and we have cases where it could be useful right away... > > This looks like a good improvement over the current situation, thanks! > > I guess this should be included in the output sent to fate as well (and > shown there in some way)? Initially I guess one can add it to the comments > column.
It shows up in the configure line; do you want it shown somewhere else? And yeah, I'd probably add it to the comments field of my own FATE instances if I used the option. Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
