On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Diego Biurrun wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 10:45:47AM +0300, Martin Storsjö wrote:
On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> This can be useful in known-broken scenarios like miscompilation
> by legacy compilers and similar.
> ---
>
> Yeah, one could come up with more elaborate solutions, but this already
> works and we have cases where it could be useful right away...
This looks like a good improvement over the current situation, thanks!
I guess this should be included in the output sent to fate as well (and
shown there in some way)? Initially I guess one can add it to the comments
column.
It shows up in the configure line; do you want it shown somewhere else?
And yeah, I'd probably add it to the comments field of my own FATE
instances if I used the option.
I thought of a separate column next to the comments (which is already used
for other things in many setups), but plugging it into the comments
probably is good for the first step.
// Martin
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
libav-devel@libav.org
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
