Not yet, I mean we will fix them, in libav or in AMF.
I quickly searched but did not find any formal standard on include guards. I 
did see some recommendations in forums though.
To get some statistics: I checked few header files in Windows SDK, OpenCL SDK, 
OpenGL, Intel Media SDK - I see all kind of styles including  __FILE_H__.
For example: 
https://github.com/Intel-Media-SDK/MediaSDK/blob/master/api/include/mfxvideo.h

Mikhail

> -----Original Message-----
> From: libav-devel [mailto:libav-devel-boun...@libav.org] On Behalf Of Diego
> Biurrun
> Sent: February 7, 2018 12:37 PM
> To: libav development <libav-devel@libav.org>
> Subject: Re: [libav-devel] Add HW H.264 and HEVC encoding for AMD GPUs
> based on AMF SDK
> 
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 04:27:30PM +0000, Mironov, Mikhail wrote:
> > Warnings should be fixed. More comments inline.
> 
> Fixed as in fixed if I pull in fresh headers from Git?
> 
> > > On Sun, Feb 04, 2018 at 07:04:39PM +0000, Mironov, Mikhail wrote:
> > > > I have a developer who will cover AMF integration on regular basis
> > > (together with me). He starts tomorrow and will be up to date soon.
> > > > I will ask him to cleanup the things you mentioned if you will not
> > > > submit the
> > > changes first.
> > > > He is on BCC for now.
> > >
> > > It seems a bit more cleanup is needed on your side as well:
> > >
> > > /home/libav/libs/include/AMF/core/Platform.h:431:16: error: implicit
> > > declaration of function ‘memcmp’
> > > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > >
> > > Indeed that header is missing a string.h #include and things break
> > > on one of my systems.
> > >
> > > Also, there are a bunch of warnings:
> > >
> > > ~/src/build/amf $ make libavcodec/amfenc.o
> > > CC      libavcodec/amfenc.o
> > > /home/diego/src/libav.vanilla/libavcodec/amfenc.c: In function
> > > ‘amf_init_context’:
> > > /home/diego/src/libav.vanilla/libavcodec/amfenc.c:159:51: warning:
> > > passing argument 2 of ‘ctx->trace->pVtbl->RegisterWriter’ from
> > > incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
> > >      ctx->trace->pVtbl->RegisterWriter(ctx->trace, ctx->writer_id,
> > > (AMFTraceWriter *)&ctx->tracer, 1);
> > >                                                    ^~~
> > > /home/diego/src/libav.vanilla/libavcodec/amfenc.c:159:51: note:
> > > expected ‘const wchar_t * {aka const int *}’ but argument is of type ‘char
> *’
> > > /home/diego/src/libav.vanilla/libavcodec/amfenc.c:160:51: warning:
> > > passing argument 2 of ‘ctx->trace->pVtbl->SetWriterLevel’ from
> > > incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
> > >      ctx->trace->pVtbl->SetWriterLevel(ctx->trace, ctx->writer_id,
> > > AMF_TRACE_TRACE);
> > >                                                    ^~~
> > > /home/diego/src/libav.vanilla/libavcodec/amfenc.c:160:51: note:
> > > expected ‘const wchar_t * {aka const int *}’ but argument is of type ‘char
> *’
> > > /home/diego/src/libav.vanilla/libavcodec/amfenc.c: In function
> > > ‘ff_amf_encode_close’:
> > > /home/diego/src/libav.vanilla/libavcodec/amfenc.c:265:57: warning:
> > > passing argument 2 of ‘ctx->trace->pVtbl->UnregisterWriter’ from
> > > incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
> > >          ctx->trace->pVtbl->UnregisterWriter(ctx->trace, ctx->writer_id);
> > >                                                          ^~~
> > > /home/diego/src/libav.vanilla/libavcodec/amfenc.c:265:57: note:
> > > expected ‘const wchar_t * {aka const int *}’ but argument is of type ‘char
> *’
> > >
> > > One could just cast them away, but probably it's better to ajust the 
> > > types.
> > >
> > >
> > > Also, I noticed two issues in your headers (at a glance):
> > >
> > > 1) You recreate parts of inttypes.h, i.e.
> > >
> > >    #define AMFPRId64    "lld"
> > >
> > >    and similar - why, oh, why? What ass-backwards systems are you trying
> to
> > >    support there?
> >
> > I don’t remember right now which system required the custom macro but it
> was real issue five years ago.
> > This is AMF SDK issue, not libav integration, we should clean this up
> though.
> 
> 5 years ago on Linux or with some of those horrible, now-obsolete MSVC
> versions? The latter I believe right away, but finding Linux systems that were
> not C99 compliant was difficult even in 2012...
> 
> > > 2) You are invading system namespace:
> > >
> > >    #ifndef __AMFPlatform_h__
> > >
> > >    Identifiers starting with __ (or _ and an uppercase letter) are 
> > > reserved
> > >    for the system. Should be easy enough to replace these with
> >
> > This is a decision made for AMF SDK which is external for libav integration.
> Which standard or recommendation are you refer to?
> 
> The C standard reserves those identifiers for the system, i.e. the kernel or 
> the
> C library.
> 
> Diego
> _______________________________________________
> libav-devel mailing list
> libav-devel@libav.org
> https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
libav-devel@libav.org
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to