On 10/16/13, James Board <[email protected]> wrote: >>And issue is probably withing avi container as it >>may not add every frame into index table. >>And when seeking you never check if returned packet actually is right >>one that you need. >> >>Or it could be bug in your code how you seek in file, etc... > > I do check the results of the seek and I do check the best_effort_timestamp, > but yes, it could be a bug in my code. Or it could be a problem > with AVI files. I'll look into it and let you know what happens. > > > I also noticed that the huffyuv code is all pure C with no MMX or SSE > instructions. Is the reason for that because huffyuv wouldn't benefit from > MMX or SSE? Or is it because nobody had time to optimize it yet?
You noted it wrong. Huffyuv does use SIMD. _______________________________________________ Libav-user mailing list [email protected] http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-user
