>You noted it wrong. Huffyuv does use SIMD.
Where? I didn't see any SIMD instructions in huffyuvenc.c or
huffyuvdec.c. Am I looking in the wrong place?
On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 4:45 PM, Paul B Mahol <[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/16/13, James Board <[email protected]> wrote:
>>And issue is probably withing avi container as it
>>may not add every frame into index table.
>>And when seeking you never check if returned packet actually is right
>>one that you need.
>>
>>Or it could be bug in your code how you seek in file, etc...
>
> I do check the results of the seek and I do check the best_effort_timestamp,
> but yes, it could be a bug in my code. Or it could be a problem
> with AVI files. I'll look into it and let you know what happens.
>
>
> I also noticed that the huffyuv code is all pure C with no MMX or SSE
> instructions. Is the reason for that because huffyuv wouldn't benefit from
> MMX or SSE? Or is it because nobody had time to optimize it yet?
You noted it wrong. Huffyuv does use SIMD.
_______________________________________________
Libav-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-user
_______________________________________________
Libav-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-user
