On 10/17/13, James Board <[email protected]> wrote: >>You noted it wrong. Huffyuv does use SIMD. > > Where? I didn't see any SIMD instructions in huffyuvenc.c or > huffyuvdec.c. Am I looking in the wrong place?
It is not in huffyuvdec.c I will give more info once you stop top posting. > > > > > > On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 4:45 PM, Paul B Mahol <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On 10/16/13, James Board <[email protected]> wrote: >>>And issue is probably withing avi container as it >>>may not add every frame into index table. >>>And when seeking you never check if returned packet actually is right >>>one that you need. >>> >>>Or it could be bug in your code how you seek in file, etc... >> >> I do check the results of the seek and I do check the >> best_effort_timestamp, >> but yes, it could be a bug in my code. Or it could be a problem >> with AVI files. I'll look into it and let you know what happens. >> >> >> I also noticed that the huffyuv code is all pure C with no MMX or SSE >> instructions. Is the reason for that because huffyuv wouldn't benefit >> from >> MMX or SSE? Or is it because nobody had time to optimize it yet? > > You noted it wrong. Huffyuv does use SIMD. > > _______________________________________________ > Libav-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-user _______________________________________________ Libav-user mailing list [email protected] http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-user
