Any list is effectively public. I'd bet hard cash that any list like LibTech has at least one person siphoning off posts to some database.
As Benjamin Franklin said "Three can keep a secret - if two of them are dead" It's a sad state, but it is good opsec to assume anything sent to a large group like LibTech is effectively public. Not making a value judgement - I am no fan of the "transparent society". But I'm also a realist. -- Greg Norcie ([email protected]) GPG key: 0x1B873635 On 8/9/12 12:39 AM, Anne Roth wrote: > Hi, > > I just saw through this tweet > https://twitter.com/csoghoian/statuses/233445976365465603 that the list > archives are public (see > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/info.html) > - is everyone aware of that? > > Until now I thought that they're available to list members only, as > stated here https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech > > I tend to prefer non-public but can see why public makes sense as well. > In any case that should be clearly mentioned on the info page, don't you > think? > > Anne > > > > > _______________________________________________ liberationtech mailing list [email protected] Should you need to change your subscription options, please go to: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech If you would like to receive a daily digest, click "yes" (once you click above) next to "would you like to receive list mail batched in a daily digest?" You will need the user name and password you receive from the list moderator in monthly reminders. You may ask for a reminder here: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech Should you need immediate assistance, please contact the list moderator. Please don't forget to follow us on http://twitter.com/#!/Liberationtech
