In general, I prefer it when the reply-to is as it is in this mailing list. When I want to reply to the sender, I hit reply, and when I want to reply to all, I hit reply all. When the reply-to is the list, it becomes more annoying to reply just to the sender.
Sam King Director | Code the Change <http://codethechange.org> - we have a Code Jam for social good coming up! Teacher | CS1U: Practical Unix <http://cs1u.stanford.edu> - videos and exercises are available free online! facebook <https://www.facebook.com/samjking>, linkedin<http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=55518052>, twitter <http://twitter.com/codethechange>, google+<https://plus.google.com/111459971983433860521>, verbose letters <http://stanford.edu/~samking/personal/> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 5:49 AM, Maxim Kammerer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Yosem Companys <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Yes, as we say in the list guidelines, our policy as an institution is > > to keep the archives private. > > For an open list, this does not make any sense — it only serves as a > hurdle. For example, the liberationtech-jobs list was mentioned a few > days back. I am curious, but not interested enough to subscribe, > confirm, archive the relevant notification messages, look at the > archive, then unsubscribe, again archiving relevant message after > confirming requests. So what I think I will do is use one of the > throwaway address services, forgetting about it immediately after > subscribing and retrieving a password, and you will get another > address to waste mailer resources on and to skew statistics. > > I would also like to voice a few suggestions about this list: > > 1. The signature is ridiculously long. You can at least prefix it with > "-- " to enable auto-hiding in most mailers when people don't have > their own signature. > 2. You should reject messages without one of the list addresses in To: > or Cc: fields. It helps filtering and prevents email from people who > put all their address book in Bcc:. > 3. Reply-To: should be to the list, not to the individual sender. > > -- > Maxim Kammerer > Liberté Linux: http://dee.su/liberte > _______________________________________________ > liberationtech mailing list > [email protected] > > Should you need to change your subscription options, please go to: > > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech > > If you would like to receive a daily digest, click "yes" (once you click > above) next to "would you like to receive list mail batched in a daily > digest?" > > You will need the user name and password you receive from the list > moderator in monthly reminders. You may ask for a reminder here: > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech > > Should you need immediate assistance, please contact the list moderator. > > Please don't forget to follow us on http://twitter.com/#!/Liberationtech >
_______________________________________________ liberationtech mailing list [email protected] Should you need to change your subscription options, please go to: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech If you would like to receive a daily digest, click "yes" (once you click above) next to "would you like to receive list mail batched in a daily digest?" You will need the user name and password you receive from the list moderator in monthly reminders. You may ask for a reminder here: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech Should you need immediate assistance, please contact the list moderator. Please don't forget to follow us on http://twitter.com/#!/Liberationtech
