On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 5:49 PM, micah anderson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Developers never made a mistake leading to a security problem, so
> Debian's one mistake in 2006 should be forever trotted out as an example
> of how Debian sucks, good point.
I once needed to patch HTPdate [1], and immediately noticed two
possibilities for buffer overflows. Immediately, because they are
obvious to anyone who knows C — in line 243:
if ( recv(server_s, buffer, BUFFERSIZE, 0) != -1 ) {
does not ensure NUL-termination of received input, and in lines 264–265:
if ( (pdate = strstr(buffer, "Date: ")) != NULL ) {
strncpy(remote_time, pdate + 11, 24);
necessary size of buffer after "Date: " is not ensured.
I have sent a patch to the author of HTPdate, and he wrote back that a
“Debian security administrator” already went over the code with him
line-by-line.
So, for the record, there are at least *two* examples why Debian sucks
security-wise.
[1] http://www.vervest.org/foswiki/bin/view/HTP/DownloadC
--
Maxim Kammerer
Liberté Linux: http://dee.su/liberte
--
Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at:
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
