I'm wondering whether some global equivalent of the copyright collection
societies http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_collective might not work
although they would need to be updated to reflect current issues around CC
and related licensing. Richer institutionscould pay in for access to Open
Access journals perhaps on a pay per usage basis and given a relatively
modest cost structure for OA journals this might be sufficient to cover
operating costs on a Robin Hood basis for poorer and LDC libraries. .just a
thought.

 

M

 

From: liberationtech-boun...@lists.stanford.edu
[mailto:liberationtech-boun...@lists.stanford.edu] On Behalf Of LISTS
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 10:58 AM
To: liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu
Subject: Re: [liberationtech] For everyone and their grad students: Fake,
pay-to-publish journals & conferences

 

Indeed, this would be a problem. However, it's already a problem, which is
to say that poorer universities cannot afford subscriptions to EBSCO and
whatnot to begin with, and thus their faculty have trouble keeping up with
research in comparison to those at richer schools. What I'm suggesting here
could at least alleviate this problem, because richer schools would
subsidize access to research. 

Moreover, I'm imagining that the cost of pay-to-publish would be far lower
than for-profit schemes like T&F and Elsevier, thus enabling poorer school's
libraries to save money and actually increase their faculty's ability to do
research (assuming that's their mission). However, I don't have numbers on
this, so I could be wrong.

- Rob Gehl

On 04/08/2013 11:52 AM, Glassman, Michael wrote:

The problem with this is that faculty from wealthier universities will have
much more capability to publish than faculty from less wealthy universities.
And those who can get their work supported by those with money have an upper
hand of getting more information out than those who do not have their work
supported.  There is already enough of this in grants perhaps.   Maybe we
could envision something like low cost subscriptions so that individuals or
universities could pay a small fee to journals they use a lot.  This works
well on a number of political blogs.
 
Michael
________________________________________
From: liberationtech-boun...@lists.stanford.edu
[liberationtech-boun...@lists.stanford.edu] on behalf of LISTS
[li...@robertwgehl.org]
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 1:45 PM
To: liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu
Subject: Re: [liberationtech] For everyone and their grad students: Fake,
pay-to-publish journals & conferences
 
Or, potentially, university libraries could shift from buying
subscriptions to paying for their university faculty's publication fees.
If the ultimate product is an open access publication, then the issue
isn't paying for access, but rather paying to produce the public good.
 
- Rob Gehl
 
On 04/08/2013 11:42 AM, michael gurstein wrote:

Publishing may be dirt cheap but any systematic/formal e.g. academic
publishing isn't free... So the problem is that while there is a necessary
and valuable shift from commercial publishing (and outrageous profiteering)
to open access online publishing there really aren't any good business
models yet to cover the (much less but not totally trivial) costs of the new
forms of academic publishing.
 
If for whatever reason (and there are lots including the issues pointed to
here) one doesn't want to go to a pay for play model that leaves
advertising(???) or donations (???) or...
 
M
 
-----Original Message-----
From: liberationtech-boun...@lists.stanford.edu
[mailto:liberationtech-boun...@lists.stanford.edu] On Behalf Of Richard
Brooks
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 9:34 AM
To: liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu
Subject: Re: [liberationtech] For everyone and their grad students: Fake,
pay-to-publish journals & conferences
 
It's not curious. It is accurate. As the funding model moved from
subscribers paying for access to authors paying for publication, the
financial incentives changed as well. The loosening of standards is an
obvious consequence of this decision.
 
The question of how best to publish quality academic information is
non-trivial. Like the question of where to get quality current affairs
information. It will take a while for things to adjust to the ability of the
Internet to make publishing dirt-cheap.
 
 
 
On 04/08/2013 12:19 PM, James Losey wrote:

I think it's curious how this article frames the journals as "open
access" rather than a more appropriate "pay to play"
 
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Yosem Companys <compa...@stanford.edu
 <mailto:compa...@stanford.edu> <mailto:compa...@stanford.edu>> wrote:
 
     From: Nathaniel Poor <natp...@gmail.com
 <mailto:natp...@gmail.com> <mailto:natp...@gmail.com>>
 
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/08/health/for-scientists-an-exploding-w
orld-of-pseudo-academia.html
 
     "The scientists who were recruited to appear at a conference called
     Entomology-2013 thought they had been selected to make a presentation
     to the leading professional association of scientists who study
     insects. But they found out the hard way that they were wrong...."
 
     This has been a problem for a while, but now it's big enough to be a
     newspaper story.
 
     -------------------------------
     Nathaniel Poor, Ph.D.
     http://natpoor.blogspot.com/
     https://sites.google.com/site/natpoor/
     --
     Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password
     by emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu
      <mailto:compa...@stanford.edu> <mailto:compa...@stanford.edu> or
changing your settings at
     https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
 
 
 
 
--
Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by
emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings
at https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
 

 
--
===================
R. R. Brooks
 
Associate Professor
Holcombe Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Clemson
University
 
313-C Riggs Hall
PO Box 340915
Clemson, SC 29634-0915
USA
 
Tel.   864-656-0920
Fax.   864-656-5910
email: r...@acm.org
web:   http://www.clemson.edu/~rrb
 
--
Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by
emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
 
--
Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by
emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech

 
--
Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by
emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
 
 
--
Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by
emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech

 

--
Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing 
moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech

Reply via email to