-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2013.06.29 11.09, David Golumbia wrote: > put more simply: the notion of a "privacy-preserving social > network" is an inherent contradiction in terms.
No, it's totally not. You can definitely build systems that allow people to have meaningful levels of privacy toward anyone not in the set of people with whom they choose to share data, while still letting them reasonably efficiently speak with those they want to speak with. I don't see why there's anything inherently contradictory in this. E. - -- Ideas are my favorite toys. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32) iF4EAREIAAYFAlHO+sQACgkQQwkE2RkM0wqCtQD/biQwnDGjxlqW6Ea/yZkYpbz2 6zTBdBW/zloHGzvZNAwA/1xbE7g2fXIa5EVLMoCR8t7q6MK7sXMeBpLaoY9rmgYF =aa3t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at [email protected] or changing your settings at https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
