-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2013.06.29 11.15, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: > It simply doesn't make sense to claim that someone didn't do > "meaningful work" when describing part of the research they've > done as "awesome".
Wat? I never said this work wasn't meaningful -- please don't attribute things to me I never said. We need more research into things like social sharing for decentralized systems. That part's awesome. However, a research proposal is not a field-appropriate system, and the architecture for one is (generally) unlikely to turn into one without nontrivial evolution or a lot of luck. E. - -- Ideas are my favorite toys. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32) iF4EAREIAAYFAlHO+moACgkQQwkE2RkM0wp9/gEAj6r1TRi3CLTKeFW0ICAEglYq J4Vtspiuz84NhJcADhMA/3P8oZeLuOufKDeuoFOayJJcox+a26mhwdUHsG1PPEkO =0f9e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at [email protected] or changing your settings at https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
