On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Roger Dingledine <a...@mit.edu> wrote:
> That was a different guy though right? And surely this time > they're doing it right, with a comprehensive design document and threat > model, open source, etc before the publicity splash? > Sort of, but I think these challenges about Google or Jared Cohen's involvements with either are a bit immaterial -- particularly given the development chain and that I believe it will be open source at the time of actual use. My understanding is that uProxy simply opens a SOCKS connection to relay traffic with your G+/XMPP peer through WebRTC; it is not exactly reinventing the Internet or circumvention. Anyway, uProxy is developed by University of Washington and Brave New Software (Lantern), hence the "seeded by Google Ideas" note. The developers seemed to be kicking around thoughts on the next stage of transport, so it would be a prime time to bother them about pluggable transports. Adam is probably on Libtech, but I have CC'ed him just in case because it would probably be more useful to talk about Lantern right now than have things derail. -- *Collin David Anderson* averysmallbird.com | @cda | Washington, D.C.
-- Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu.
