Isn't it reasonable to assume that EVERYBODY IS BEING OR IS BOUND TO
BE SPIED ON in the Internet?
Shouldn't we just assume that, and move on to other, more interesting, things?
:-D
("no puedo luchar estoy cansada, si dejo de luchar es cobardía, traigo
mi corazón despedazado por conseguir tu amor querida mía!")
IMNSHO, iT is very silly to think that a ragtag global
crypto-activists would have EVEN THE SLIGHTEST CHANCE to beat the NSA,
ETC.
And, in the meantime, this list, as probably so many others, have been
hijacked by the Cryptopic! NOT FARKING FAIR!!!
Where's the list moderator when it comes to this kind of pattern?
Best Regards | Cordiales Saludos | Grato,
Andrés L. Pacheco Sanfuentes
<[email protected]>
+1 (817) 271-9619
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Seth David Schoen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Guido Witmond writes:
>
>> Blocking a camera (and muting it's microphone) are wise things to do,
>> but here Yahoo had 'forgotten' to implement end-to-end encryption.
>
> ... or even client-server encryption between the user and Yahoo.
>
> (Disclosure: my employer has a competing webcam privacy tool.)
>
> --
> Seth Schoen <[email protected]>
> Senior Staff Technologist https://www.eff.org/
> Electronic Frontier Foundation https://www.eff.org/join
> 815 Eddy Street, San Francisco, CA 94109 +1 415 436 9333 x107
> --
> Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of
> list guidelines will get you moderated:
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe,
> change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at
> [email protected].
--
Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of
list guidelines will get you moderated:
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe,
change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at
[email protected].
