No, the idea combined with the drive and courage to move forward with
it is worth the most.



--- In [email protected], "Anna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ok, so the mind is worth the most, right?
> Anna
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Paul 
>   To: [email protected] 
>   Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 11:54 AM
>   Subject: [Libertarian] Re: the truth....
> 
> 
>   Yes it is absolutely just.  It is right and it is fair.  One man with
>   an idea can employ thousands of people.  A man with a skill looking to
>   work but with no ideas must hope for the man with the idea to give him
>   the job.
> 
> 
> 
>   --- In [email protected], "Anna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   >
>   > This  is the whole issue:
>   > Is the physical work worth more than  thinking or doing deals?  The
>     same? 
>   > You claim that the guy who does the thinking deserves to get more.
>   > This means that the worker's effort in building the house is worth
>   less than the guy's who did not lift a finger doing the
construction job.
>   > Is it just?
>   > Anna 
>   > 
>   >   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   >   From: Paul 
>   >   To: [email protected] 
>   >   Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 8:28 AM
>   >   Subject: [Libertarian] Re: the truth....
>   > 
>   > 
>   >   Nobody is being "duped" or unfairly taken advantage of in your
>   >   example.  The person who takes the risks deserves the rewards.
 The
>   >   person who built the contractor company with his own money
deserves
>   >   the profits.
>   > 
>   >   The person who agrees to take a job for $10/hr is agreeing
that this
>   >   is the value of his labor.  He isn't being lied to about the job
>   >   conditions, or what would be expected of him.  He voluntarily
takes
>   >   the position for the agreed upon sum.  How much money the
contractor
>   >   collects for the job is irrelevant to the amount the worker is
paid.  
>   > 
>   >   The money would fairly be divided by giving him $10/hr and for the
>   >   contractor to keep $40/hr for his labor.
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   >   --- In [email protected], "Anna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   >   >
>   >   > Good question, what is an exploitation then?
>   >   > I would say robbing others of their honest pay for an honest
effort,
>   >   or duping less privileged into accepting a deal which will rob
him of
>   >   what is owned them fair and square. But, what is fair and square?
>   >   >  Example: two men seek work. They decide to form a
contractor team.
>   >   One seeks the contracts, the other  does the physical job.
>   >   > The guy who seeks contracts charges 50 dollars per foot of a
>   >   finished home.  But since  the ongoing rate for a physical
work is 10
>   >   dollars , this is how much he will pay his partner/worker  himself
>   >   taking the rest. 
>   >   >  How do you think the money should be divided? 
>   >   > Anna
>   >   > 
>   >   >   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   >   >   From: M.A. Johnson 
>   >   >   To: [email protected] 
>   >   >   Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 9:51 PM
>   >   >   Subject: Re: [Libertarian] Re: the truth....
>   >   > 
>   >   > 
>   >   >   Anna
>   >   >       Financial competition  fosters greed and
>   >   >       exploitation. Show me one example where
>   >   >       it does not.
>   >   >   MJ
>   >   >   What is 'greed'?
>   >   >   In a mutual contract, who is 'exploited'?
>   >   > 
>   >   >   Anna
>   >   >   Capitalism  on the other hand  thrives on these traits. But
>   >   >   it does not mean that the results  can be  positive. Financial
>   >   >   competition without a sense of inner justice must always
>   >   >   end in violence.   To remedy, you need the laws. But... when
>   >   >   you introduce too many laws, it no longer is libertarian,
is it?
>   >   > 
>   >   >   MJ
>   >   >   When you introduce laws (Government intervention), it is
>   >   >   no longer Capitalism, but instead another variant of
>   >   >   Socialism.
>   >   > 
>   >   >   Regard$,
>   >   >   --MJ
>   >   > 
>   >   >   There is simply no other choice than this: either
>   >   >   abstain from interference in the free play of the
>   >   >   market, or to delegate the entire management of
>   >   >   production and distribution to the government.
>   >   >   Either capitalism or socialism: there exists no
>   >   >   middle way. -- Ludwig von Mises
>   >   > 
>   >   > 
>   >   > 
>   >   > 
>   >   > 
>   >   >   ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian 
>   >   > 
>   >   > 
>   >   > 
>   >   >
>   >  
>  
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   >   >   YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 
>   >   > 
>   >   >     a..  Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
>   >   >       
>   >   >     b..  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>   >   >      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   >   >       
>   >   >     c..  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
Terms of
>   >   Service. 
>   >   > 
>   >   > 
>   >   >
>   >  
>  
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   >   > 
>   >   > 
>   >   > 
>   >   > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>   >   >
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   >   ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   >   SPONSORED LINKS E government  Libertarian  E government strategy  
>   >         Libertarian party  E government procurement  
>   > 
>   > 
>   >
>  
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   >   YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 
>   > 
>   >     a..  Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
>   >       
>   >     b..  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>   >      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   >       
>   >     c..  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
>   Service. 
>   > 
>   > 
>   >
>  
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>   >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian 
> 
> 
> 
>   SPONSORED LINKS E government  Libertarian  E government strategy  
>         Libertarian party  E government procurement  
> 
> 
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 
> 
>     a..  Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
>       
>     b..  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>       
>     c..  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service. 
> 
> 
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>








------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/KlSolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to