Anna, though imperfect as such, America is indeed a good 
example of a partial free market leading to enough prosperous 
security that its people are world renowned for VOLUNTARY 
giving; aka, love.  

What do you think happens to this 'spirit of giving' IF 
and WHEN it's coerced by govt?  Kids (developing humans)  
naturally 'share' to increase the pleasure of playing with 
mates IF they are secure in their 'domains' (body & justly 
held possessions)  That's negated when some adult violates 
the child's personal soverignty by intervening with superior 
brute physical force to compel 'sharing'  

I very much disagree with, what appears to be by you, an 
excessive discounting of the human potential for decency :(  


-Terry Liberty Parker 
Please see what I wrote in 
'Real world' experiment in LIBERTARIAN community became famous
at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LibertyProspects/message/2569 


   

--- In [email protected], "Anna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Was there any experiment done  which would show that when people 
enjoy free market opportunities without the  central government, and 
restricting laws, they are more loving, or more giving and sharing?
> It could prove that you are right. 
> Anna
> 
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Terry L Parker 
>   To: [email protected] 
>   Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 6:57 PM
>   Subject: [Libertarian] Re: the truth....
> 
> 
>   Anna, I do NOT agree with defining the loving act of charity 
>   as an obligation!  
> 
>   A person can do something out of agreed upon DUTY (obligation) 
>   OR out of LOVE.  For example, a woman can sexually satisfy 
>   her man as a 'duty' OR as a an act of 'love'  What would 
>   you think of the man who didn't know, or even care to know, 
>   the difference.  
> 
>   The children (develping humans) I have helped to raise 
>   (stewardship), and the many more I've been around, DO 
>   naturally share; though not always when some adult wants.  
>   *IF* a child is given sufficient 'domain' AND are secure 
>   in their 'domain' (their body and justly held possessions) 
>   FEAR is reduced and is NATUALLY replaced by love.  ALSO, 
>   children who ARE 'secure' in their just 'property rights' 
>   WANT to share playthings with their playmates (win/win)  
> 
>   Negating the security of a developing person's domain (body 
>   and justly held possessions) will NATURALLY induce more FEAR
>   and insecurity. SOME adults do this by coercing 'sharing'  
>   Are we surprised that this ESCALATES to MORE authoritarianism?  
> 
>   If you want a more loving society, stop redefining that which 
>   persons do out of 'love' into 'duty' (obligation)  
> 
> 
>   -Terry Liberty Parker 
>   Please see what I wrote in 
>   What's at the Heart of What Libertarians are Selling? 
>   at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/30419
> 
> 
> 
>   --- In [email protected], "Anna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   >
>   > Hello Terry,   Charity has to be taught,  a person is not born 
with 
>   it. 
>   > It  is taught by making it a moral obligation. These is also 
how 
>   children are taught values.  
>   >  
>   > The only thing that separates man from animal is altruism.  
>   > Anna
>   > 
>   > 
>   >   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   >   From: Terry L Parker 
>   >   To: [email protected] 
>   >   Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 9:17 PM
>   >   Subject: [Libertarian] Re: the truth....
>   > 
>   > 
>   >   Anna, what is the 'spirit' behind redefining acts of love 
>   >   as being acts of obligation; and what can be said of those 
>   >   who don't know the difference?  
>   > 
>   >   -Terry Liberty Parker 
>   >   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian 
>   > 
>   > 
>   >   --- In [email protected], "Anna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>   >   >
>   >   > But honestly, should we not share  our good fortune with 
those 
>   who 
>   >   are sick, old or disabled? A society that ignores its poor, 
>   cannot 
>   >   be  healthy or morally strong. Do  you want to resurrect 
Sparta?  
>   >   > Anna
>   >   >   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   >   >   From: James Landrith 
>   >   >   To: [email protected] 
>   >   >   Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 5:53 PM
>   >   >   Subject: RE: [Libertarian] Re: the truth....
>   >   > 
>   >   > 
>   >   >   Umm, because, like welfare is not magic money.  And stuff.
>   >   > 
>   >   > 
>   >   > 
>   >   >   It comes via the state sponsored theft of others.
>   >   > 
>   >   > 
>   >   > 
>   >   >   Feel free to donate all you wish to help others (and I 
do), 
>   but 
>   >   the moment
>   >   >   you empower government to take it from one person and 
give it 
>   to 
>   >   another you
>   >   >   become a party to theft.
>   >   > 
>   >   > 
>   >   > 
>   >   >   Does that about sum it up?
>   >   > 
>   >   > 
>   >   > 
>   >   >   
>   __________________________________________________________________
>   >   >   James Landrith
>   >   >   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   >   >   cell: 703-593-2065 * fax: 760-875-8547
>   >   >   AIM: jlnales * ICQ: 148600159
>   >   >   MSN and Yahoo! Messenger: jlandrith
>   >   >   Taking the Gloves Off -  <http://www.jameslandrith.com>
>   >   >   http://www.jameslandrith.com
>   >   >   The Multiracial Activist -  <http://www.multiracial.com>
>   >   >   http://www.multiracial.com
>   >   >   The Abolitionist Examiner -  
>   >   <http://www.multiracial.com/abolitionist/>
>   >   >   http://www.multiracial.com/abolitionist/
>   >   >   
>   __________________________________________________________________
>   >   > 
>   >   > 
>   >   > 
>   >   >     _____  
>   >   > 
>   >   >   From: [email protected] 
>   >   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>   >   >   Behalf Of Anna
>   >   >   Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 7:45 PM
>   >   >   To: [email protected]
>   >   >   Subject: Re: [Libertarian] Re: the truth....
>   >   > 
>   >   > 
>   >   > 
>   >   >   Basically, you are against the welfare. What is your 
argument?
>   >   >   Anna
>   >   >     ----- Original Message ----- 
>   >   >     From: Paul 
>   >   >     To: [email protected] 
>   >   >     Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 8:00 AM
>   >   >     Subject: [Libertarian] Re: the truth....
>   >   > 
>   >   > 
>   >   >     The poor, elderly, and infirmed would have more help 
under a
>   >   >     completely free market system than they do with the 
>   government 
>   >   system
>   >   >     now.  They'd get help from friends, family, neighbors, 
>   their 
>   >   church,
>   >   >     private charities, and others who want to help.  And 
unlike 
>   the 
>   >   money
>   >   >     the government collects, the vast majority would make 
it to 
>   >   those in
>   >   >     need, the care given would be by people who genuinely 
care 
>   >   about the
>   >   >     well-being of those in need, and nobody would be robbed 
to 
>   pay 
>   >   for it
>   >   >     so there would be no animosity towards them.
>   >   > 
>   >   > 
>   >   > 
>   >   > 
>   >   > 
>   >   > 
>   >   >   [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>   >   > 
>   >   > 
>   >   > 
>   >   >   ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian 
>   >   > 
>   >   > 
>   >   > 
>   >   >   SPONSORED LINKS E government  Libertarian  E government 
>   strategy  
>   >   >         Libertarian party  E government procurement  
>   >   > 
>   >   > 
>   >   > ------------------------------------------------------------
----
>   ----
>   >   ----------
>   >   >   YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 
>   >   > 
>   >   >     a..  Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
>   >   >       
>   >   >     b..  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>   >   >      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   >   >       
>   >   >     c..  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! 
>   Terms 
>   >   of Service. 
>   >   > 
>   >   > 
>   >   > ------------------------------------------------------------
----
>   ----
>   >   ----------
>   >   > 
>   >   > 
>   >   > 
>   >   > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>   >   >
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   >   ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > ----------------------------------------------------------------
----
>   ----------
>   >   YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 
>   > 
>   >     a..  Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
>   >       
>   >     b..  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>   >      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   >       
>   >     c..  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! 
Terms 
>   of Service. 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > ----------------------------------------------------------------
----
>   ----------
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>   >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian 
> 
> 
> 
>   SPONSORED LINKS E government  Libertarian  E government strategy  
>         Libertarian party  E government procurement  
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
>   YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 
> 
>     a..  Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
>       
>     b..  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>       
>     c..  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms 
of Service. 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>







------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/KlSolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to