This is corect Ed.  Like gravity, natural rights have always existed,
and merely needed to be discovered.  



--- In [email protected], "Edward J. Williamson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Natural laws exist independently of consciousness. The fact that 
> existence exists independently of any conscious thought is axiomatic. 
> Whether or not man existed has no bearing on gravity or any other 
> immutable natural/scientific law. Man may ascribe names and labels, 
> and study the existence and applications of those laws, but they 
> exist independently of our conscious existence.
> 
> --- In [email protected], "Anna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > < Gravity IS a natural law and you just stated that you could 
> measure
> > it. > 
> > 
> > Nothing can be really measured. All measurements are  relative. 
> Gravity is not a natural law. When you leave the earth, there is no 
> gravity, is there? 
> > Gravity is created by mass of an object affecting the space time 
> fabric. Without the object, there would be no gravity. Without a man 
> peesent, there would be no laws.  
> > Anna
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >   ----- Original Message ----- 
> >   From: Paul 
> >   To: [email protected] 
> >   Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 5:30 PM
> >   Subject: objective vs subjective Re: [Libertarian] Re: 
> Socialism/Capitalism of the Author
> > 
> > 
> >   --- In [email protected], Deus Ex Machina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
> >   >
> >   > Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >   > > Ok, so are you denying that we have sole dominion over our 
> own lives
> >   > > and body (including the organisms within them)?  This means 
> you're
> >   > > saying that someone else can have more of a claim on your 
> body than
> >   > > you do.  This is the exact opposite of the premise of 
> libertarianism.
> >   > > 
> >   > > Either that or you are denying that natural law exists.  
> Which is
> >   it?  
> >   > 
> >   > both. the current system already doesnt give you rights to your 
> own dna.
> > 
> > 
> >   Oh, so you're saying you're not a libertarian.  That's all you 
> had to
> >   say.  Anyone that denies that we own our own DNA, and that we have
> >   sole dominion over ourselves (and the organisms within ourselves) 
> is
> >   not a libertarian.  Nor would any libertarian on earth say that 
> one
> >   person would have any claim to the body of another.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >   > 
> >   > > Do you deny that gravity exists or do you deny that we own 
> ourselves?
> >   > 
> > 
> > 
> >   > you can measure gravity, how do you measure natural law?
> > 
> >   Gravity IS a natural law and you just stated that you could 
> measure
> >   it.  Natural rights are a subset of natural law, and rights can't 
> be
> >   measured, but the violation of rights can be measured.  The 
> ability to
> >   measure something is not a requirement for its existance.  Can you
> >   measure love?  Do you deny that love exists?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >   > 
> >   > > One can not be a libertarian while denying natural law, 
> natural
> >   > > rights, or sole dominion over our lives and bodies (including 
> the
> >   > > organisms within).  
> >   > > 
> >   > > If you're not a libertarian, I understand completely.  Then 
> it makes
> >   > > sense that you're claiming that some organism living in a 
> person's
> >   > > body has more of a claim on that person's body than they do 
> for
> >   > > themselves, but if you are a libertarian, you know this is 
> bullshit.
> >   > > 
> >   > > You either take self-ownership as a fact or you don't.  There 
> is no in
> >   > >  between.  
> >   > 
> > 
> > 
> >   > even your position is not self consistent if you claim a person 
> as
> >   > dominion over there own body then an unborn child should have 
> dominion
> >   > over its own body, just because it gets food from the mother 
> means
> >   > nothing.
> >   > 
> >   > Vic
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >   Wrong.  My position is 100% consistent at all times.  An "unborn
> >   child" has no rights because there is no such thing as an unborn
> >   child.  Until the moment it leaves the body of the host, it is a
> >   biological parasite.  And as I said, nothing inside my body has 
> any
> >   rights because I alone own my body and all of its contents.  I 
> have
> >   sole dominion over my body and make all life and death decisions 
> for
> >   the organisms within the body and even for my body.  Nobody else 
> on
> >   earth has any claim to my body, including the organisms within my
> >   body.  The combined population of the planet earth minus me has no
> >   legitimate say what-so-ever in what I do or don't do with my body 
> or
> >   the organisms within.
> > 
> >   ALL LIBERTARIANS....I repeat....ALL LIBERTARIANS believe in 
> complete
> >   self-ownership of our body and everything inside of our body.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >   ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> >   YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 
> > 
> >     a..  Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
> >       
> >     b..  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> >      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >       
> >     c..  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms 
> of Service. 
> > 
> > 
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>









------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/KlSolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to