Execution is just one of the ramifications of your position that would have later-term abortions charged as murder. Were your position to become law, do you think these female "murders" would not be executed (despite your disagreement with capital punishment)? You are simply trying to deny the terrible end-result of your legislation, a common oversight of the legislative mentality. "Assumption"? Yes, a correct one. But where is the "lie"?
Lesson for the day: Laws can only be enforced with violent aggression. You cannot promote the former without promoting the latter. -Mark _____ Too bad Anna will likely not be >> eligible - she promotes the murder of women (execution) for >> committing non-crimes> I do? Oh boy, you are full of assumptions, aren't you. I am against death penalty , period. Your accusation may be amusing to some people, but to me it looks like an attempt to win an argument with a lie. Congratulation. Anna _____ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/KlSolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
