Vic,
That's easy. "Harm" in the political sense usually denotes non-consensual damage to an innocent other. Therefore, there is no harm prevented by enforcing seatbelt laws - because NOT wearing one doesn't "hurt" anyone. Maybe you could respond to some of the examples of potential future seat-belt-like laws I provided earlier. For your perusing pleasure, here are some more: 1. Let's outlaw backyard football without the proper gear (guards, helmets, etc). 2. Let's make helmet laws for bicycles. 3. Let's outlaw all swimming in all bodies of water over 6 feet deep without a hired lifeguard (professionally trained, insured, bonded, licensed and certified only, of course). 4. Let's just outlaw all sports - just to be "safe". I know all of them are not real risky (golf?), but heck most of them are. It is also conspicuous that you have failed to reply to my challenge to you about anything you did today that did not consist of your definition of contributory negligence, and my question about whether you've ever been drinking with a buddy. -Mark _____ You are making statements without any actual evidence. what evidence is there that seat belt laws for instance cause more harm then they fix? Vic _____ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 1.2 million kids a year are victims of human trafficking. Stop slavery. http://us.click.yahoo.com/U6CDDD/izNLAA/cUmLAA/KlSolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
