Or was that 1965?--- In [email protected], "terry12622000" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If you look at the Civil Rights act of 1964, discrimnation is legal 
> in some cases such as the number of employees in a work place, the 
> number of rentals and weither or not the owner lives in the 
residence 
> with regard to housing, interstate commerce applies with some 
> business where local may not and public accodmdation applies in 
> others so thus you can have a all white mens club that serves food, 
> drinks, entertainment, has sleeping 
> quarters.                             
>          I am for freedom of association but that freedom would 
also 
> include not association with bigots, boycotting their services and 
> goods and boycottig those that associate with the bigots, secondary 
> boycotts should be 
> allowed.                                                        
>         Advertising as open to the public might also be false 
> advertising if in fact an establishment discrimnates against  a 
> certain race, sex, or faith and could be open to a lawsuit, so it 
> probally would be better for the establisment to be a private 
> club.               
>    Since state governments have the authority to incorporate 
business 
> and other organzations that want the status they might also be 
> allowed to set regulations on discrimnation of corporations but the 
> federal government does not have that authority, although with the 
> 14th amendment the state must offer equal protection of the 
> law.            
>    Still  it could be equal protection to allow for incorporation 
of 
> private clubs if all races etc were allowed to incorporate a 
private 
> club. The state could of course charge an annual users fee for the 
> services of incorporations and  if citizens were compensated by the 
> fee they would be a lot more likely not to worry about private 
> incorporated clubs or corporations in 
> 
general.                                                              
>            
>        In some cases discrimnation may in fact have what is called 
a 
> social or public benefit for example a  school for black boys only 
> taught by Black men or even possibly in some poor aress of rural 
KY. 
> or WV a school for white boys only with only white men as 
> teachers.               
>          The Mom and Pop store which has the " we reserve the right 
> to refuse service" for the most part is not a real problem but a 
> National fast food corporate chain with the same sign to imply 
Blacks 
> keep out could be a real problem.--- In 
[email protected], 
> Cory Nott <corynott@> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > 
> > zmaitreya11 <zmaitreya11@> wrote:  I am interested and intrigued 
> with the Libertarian Party.  I find 
> > myself agreeing with most Libertarian positions.  I have 
taken "the 
> > world's shortest quiz" at the lp.org site and came out as a 
> > Libertarian.  
> > 
> > Yet I am still having trouble with the Libertarian view in regard 
> to 
> > civil rights and the government's role in ending discrimination.  
> > The Libertarian view is that government should have no role in 
this 
> > area.  Supposedly the market will correct things.  For example, a 
> > business owner who refuses to serve black people at let's say his 
> > restaurant would not want to do that because he would not want to 
> > lose that business.
> > 
> > That may sound good in theory, but what if it is a small, racist, 
> > predominantly white community.  The business owner might make 
more 
> > profit by refusing to serve black people.  Currently we have laws 
> > against such discrimination, but in a Libertarian world, there 
> would 
> > be no such laws?  What if the restaurant owner knew that he would 
> > lose much of his regular customers by serving black people?  What 
> > incentive would there be for this business owner to serve 
blacks?  
> > The market would not correct this issue.  The market does not 
make 
> > everything better.
> > 
> > Are there any Libertarian solutions to this dilemna?
> > 
> > David
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >   SPONSORED LINKS 
> >         Libertarian   English language   Political parties     
> Online dictionary   American politics 
> >     
> > ---------------------------------
> >   YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 
> > 
> >     
> >     Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
> >     
> >     To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> >  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >     
> >     Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of 
> Service. 
> > 
> >     
> > ---------------------------------
> >   
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>







ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to