From: Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Wrong. The Constitution is not immoral or unlibertarian. In > fact, in > my opinion it's the single greatest thing ever written by mankind. > The Constitution is a contract, and if you choose to live within the > borders of America, you are subject to the contract. You can claim > that I don't own the market all you like, but you are wrong. Even if > I am not selling anything in the market, I own the market every > bit as > much as a person selling goods in it. > > Think of the market as a mall owned by a corporation. Everyone in > America is a stockholder in the corporation and the mall is an asset > of the corporation. Those who want to sell thier goods in the mall > must pay rent to the corporation. The stockholders of the corporation > have said that those who sell goods made by the corporation don't have > to pay rent in the mall, but those selling goods made by another > corporation must pay rent. > > It doesn't matter if you're a stockholder of the corporation that owns > the mall, or a stockholder from another corporation. You must pay > rent if you intend to sell goods made by a corporation other than the > one who owns the mall. > > It doesn't matter who bought the goods, or who wants to buy them. All > that matters is where the goods were made and where they are going to > be sold. Your ownership of property you bought from another > corporation is irrelevant. If you want to sell your foreign goods in > this mall, you must pay rent. > > If you refuse to pay rent, you are trespassing and stealing from the > stockholders of the corporation.
This is a very poor analogy. The real issue is property ownership and property rights. Your attempts to say other wise are bullshit. You must prove that it is a correct thing morally to interfere with my property rights. So far you have not done so. The situation is not in any way like a corporate mall. You have no choice where you are born. You have rights and the right to property is one of them. Your attempts to say that you have a moral right to interfere in my property rights are false. Your analogy is misleading. Your claims that you can interfere with my rights because the constitution says you can only point up the fact that the constitution is wrong on this point as well. BWS ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
