Terry is correct. It's a common logical fallacy called
"argumentum ad populum".
************
{American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote
"not guilty" based on nothing more than a disagreement with the
case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's instructions.
There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" to arrive at a
unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your ground, and fulfill
its other main purpose: to counteract abusive government and
unjust lawsuits.
See www.fija.org
[Please adopt this as your own signature.] }
_____
UnCoolRabit, while I don't agree with all that Paul has posted,
it does NOT matter how many agree or not for a proposition to
be true or not; for example, 2+2=4 regardless of how many say
otherwise.
-TLP
--- In [email protected], "uncoolrabbit"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> PS: Paul, notice this is the most popular thread in the forumn
right
> now, and every one posting is agaisnt you... should be a clue.
>
_____
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
