And tell me please, by whose definition of libertarianism does that 
position eminent?  

That's NOT the libertarian movement I joined in 1985 straight out of 
the Navy in Jacksonville, Florida.  I was a Pro-Choice political 
activist recruited by the Florida Libertarian Party (Nick Dunbar, 
Dianne Pilcher, Rex Curry, et.al.).  They didn't say anything to me 
about non-interventionist foreign policy or pacifism.  It was 
all, "Hey, Eric, we Libertarians are basically Pro-Choice 
Conservatives; free market/Milton Friedman/Ayn Rand types on 
Capitalism, yet Pro-Choice, Pro-Rock 'n Roll, Pro-Sex and Pro-Drug 
Legalization on social matters."

I said COOL, I'm joining Dudes and Dudettes.  It was only later 
about a year or two after that I learned there were nutty Leftwinger 
America-hating pacifists in the LP.  

Has the LP been misrepresenting itself to potential recruits?

And if so, just what political movement should individuals such as 
myself join, if we are hardcore Pro-Choice/Pro-Drug Legalization, 
Pro-Free Markets on Economics, but also Pro-Defense, Pro-Patriotic 
and Pro-America.

Tell me Paul.  Do you wish to split the libertarian movement right 
down the middle, and cast off all those who disagree with you on 
foreign policy?









--- In [email protected], "Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Nope.  Not even close.  It wouldn't matter if Saddam and his sons 
were
> murdering 10,000 Iraqi people per day, boiling thier screaming
> children in oil on national television and had live torture game
> shows.  It wouldn't matter if he took over the entire middle-east,
> ruled with an iron fist, and controlled every drop of oil in the
> middle-east.  No amount of human rights violations or even 
genocide is
> justification to use the U.S. military for any reason other than
> responding to an attack against AMERICA.  Being a "super power" 
does
> NOT mean it's our responsibility to stop human suffering, 
oppression,
> or even genocide happening elsewhere.  It's not a libertarian 
position
> to steal from Americans and to send Americans to die defending 
people
> in another country.  It's also not Constitutional.  The libertarian
> position is to keep the government small and cheap and never to use
> the military other than in OUR OWN defense when we are attacked and
> not otherwise.
> 
> We are the well wishers of freedom and liberty to all, but the
> champions only of our own.
> 
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected], "Eric Dondero Rittberg"
> <ericdondero@> wrote:
> >
> > No, the US was justified in invading Iraq, for one, and one 
reason 
> > only; the massive human rights violations of Saddam, Uday, Qusay 
and 
> > their henchmen.  Just as bad as Pol Pot's Khmer Rouge.  As the 
> > world's only remaining superpower it is OUR responsibility to 
stop 
> > human genocide on the planet.  That is inherently a very 
libertarian 
> > position, and it's amazing many libertarians have chosen to put 
> > themselves on the side of totalitarian dictators instead of on 
the 
> > side of liberation.  
> > 
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], "uncoolrabbit" 
> > <uncoolrabbit@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Nothing Paul said below  contradicts that Iraqi's statement. 
None 
> > of 
> > > sadams chemical weapons were found, that includes any that 
made it 
> > > to Syria. It is no secret that Iraq had chemical and 
biological 
> > > weapons. The real crime of the administration is falsely 
leading 
> > the 
> > > people to believe IRaq was actively developing new wweapons, 
> > > including nuclear ambitions, which was not the case. 
> > > 
> > > So, what does the statement have to do with calling Paul a 
liar? 
> > The 
> > > Iraqi does not know where they went, only supporting Paul in 
his 
> > > claim that no WMDs were found in Iraq. It IS a fact.
> > > 
> > > Aside from the specifics of Pauls statements validity, what 
else 
> > are 
> > > you trying to get at? That the administration is justified in 
> > > invading Iraq over a past and now dead chemical and biological 
> > > weapons program, and that traces off that prgram, including 
the 
> > > undestroyed products of that program, products the US has 
aswell 
> > and 
> > > has been slowly destroying for years, are all the 
justification 
> > > needed, while that same administration tolerated a real 
program to 
> > > develop nuclear weapons in North Korea? This war had nothing 
to do 
> > > with Iraq's arsenal, get over it.
> > > 
> > > --- In [email protected], "Eric Dondero Rittberg" 
> > > <ericdondero@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > And so Paul, you are claiming then that you know more about 
what 
> > > > actually happened to the WMDs than the 2nd in Command of the 
> > Iraqi 
> > > > Air Force who a few weeks ago, in an interview, stated 
> > > categorically 
> > > > that "we shuffled them all off to Syria two months before 
the 
> > > > invasion..."?
> > > > 
> > > > Are you calling the guy a liar Paul?
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > --- In [email protected], "Paul" <ptireland@> 
wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't find anything ridiculous about the indisputable 
FACT 
> > that
> > > > > there were no WMD's found.  Not even non-WMDs like mustard 
gas 
> > > were
> > > > > found.  Only the components that could be used to make 
mustard 
> > > gas
> > > > > were found.  So once again, NO WMDs WERE FOUND.  That's 
not an 
> > > > attack
> > > > > on the President.  IT IS A FACT and those who claim 
otherwise 
> > are
> > > > > woefully misinformed or completely dishonest and most 
likely 
> > Bush
> > > > > apologists.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > --- In [email protected], "Geof Gibson" 
> > <geofgibson@> 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Terry L Parker" 
> > > <txliberty@>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Geof, attack message, NOT messengers, in THIS forum!  
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > -Terry Liberty Parker 
> > > > > > > Owner/moderator, 
> > > > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian 
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I'm sorry.  I try my best to attack ridiculous arguments 
> > > without
> > > > > > personal reference.
> > > > > > I will re-double my efforts to remain impersonal.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>










ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to