Hell, I don't know. Sounds like some question straight from a panel
of the Cato Institute on legal foundations of the Constitution, or
some stuff subject matter like that.
Honestly Mark, I haven't really thought about such stuff.
More interested in tackling useful topics like GETTING LIBERTARIANS
ELECTED TO PUBLIC OFFICE!!!!!!!
Here's a question for you. How many candidate brochures were you
able to deliver and how many signs were you able to get up for
libertarian candidates in the 2004 election cycle?
[ ModeratorNote: Eric is discrediting his advocacy by resorting
to ad hominem ('to the man') in what he thinks is a distraction
from Mark's appropriate question about Eric's stance. Mark busting
Eric is very much ON-topic here. I'm allowing Eric's above ad
hominem (this one time) as a good example of bad forum behavior.
-TLP ]
--- In [email protected], "mark robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Eric,
>
>
>
> I believe you had said a signed pledge is force. I asked what
> kind of force. I said I thought it sounded like a contract. I
> asked if you view contracts as aggression. I don't think any of
> that was too technical or off topic; it was simple and directly
> responsive to your comments. So, if you don't mind, the questions
> still stand.
>
>
>
> -Mark
>
>
>
>
>
> ************
> {American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote
> "not guilty" based on nothing more than a disagreement with the
> case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's instructions.
> There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" to arrive at a
> unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your ground, and fulfill
> its other main purpose: to counteract abusive government and
> unjust lawsuits.
> See www.fija.org
> [Please adopt this as your own signature.] }
>
>
>
>
> _____
>
>
>
>
> I'm not sure what your question is below? You're getting a bit
> too
> technical IMHO. Not quite sure what all this has to do with
> electing more libertarians to public office?
>
>
> --- In [email protected], "mark robert" <colowe@>
> wrote:
> >
> > Eric,
> >
> >
> >
> > Sounds like some LP groups require a signature and others
> don't.
> > Nonetheless, you think it's force. Is it the kind of force that
> > qualifies as the initiation of aggression (the one that
> > libertarianism is against)? Or is it the kind of force to which
> > you agreed to abide when you voluntarily joined this group? To
> > me, it sounds more like a contract. Do you view consensual
> > contracts as aggression?
> >
> >
> >
> > -Mark
> >
>
>
>
> _____
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
