If you feel big ridiculing the spelling of a dyslexic on a public computer in a third world country that has no spell checker, that is your peragative. It does not however add support to your statements.
--- In [email protected], "mark robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Uncool, > > > > Here's my opening statement playing yours: > > "I knoe it all because I have been curect bufore. It simpli takes > a smartre person to understand that." > > (You have got to be joking! At least it prepared me for your next > "logical" viewpoint.) > > > > First, your writing is a little better but I still must depend on > hunches for comprehension. Secondly, I don't remember mentioning > nicotine in this thread. Thirdly, I don't remember making that > kind of argument about the drug war in this thread; the one that > I think you are maybe trying to intend to want to maybe claim > that I made. But that's just a guess because you see, there's > this problem with MY intellectual effort. LOL. > > > > -Mark > > > > ************ > {American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote > "not guilty" based on nothing more than a disagreement with the > case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's instructions. > There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" to arrive at a > unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your ground, and fulfill > its other main purpose: to counteract abusive government and > unjust lawsuits. > See www.fija.org > [Please adopt this as your own signature.] } > > > > > _____ > > > > It is not inpossible, as I have been understood before. It simply > > takes more intelectual effort to decipher. > > Restatement > > Devestation of nicotine is greater than devistation of illegal > drugs. (summarized thought, not my own) > > Suggesting, thus, that legalization means greater devistation, > and > thus only poor logic could lead to the conclusion (based on above > > thought) that legalization is the right choice, unless greater > devestation was your desired goal. > > So, I find poor logic behind the statement that because legal > nicotine does more damage than ilegal narcotics, narcotics too > should be legal. > > This is not nessasarily an attack on legalization, just a comment > on > how nonsensical the propossed logic was. > > > > --- In [email protected], "mark robert" <colowe@> > wrote: > > > > Uncool, > > > > > > > > Could you please explain / re-write your post. I honestly can't > > figure out what you are saying. You may actually have some good > > points, but I hesitate to reply on a hunch. Your writing is > > impossible to read because your grammar and punctuation are > > almost non-existent. Also, it might help if you would stop > > repeatedly misspelling the topic on which you wish to be heard > > opining: "PROHIBITION". > > > > > > > > -Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > ************ > > {American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote > > "not guilty" based on nothing more than a disagreement with the > > case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's > instructions. > > There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" to arrive at > a > > unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your ground, and > fulfill > > its other main purpose: to counteract abusive government and > > unjust lawsuits. > > See www.fija.org > > [Please adopt this as your own signature.] } > > > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > That appears like poor logic to appose prohabition... The lack > of > > > > prohibition on nicotine products, and the far greater > devestation > > to > > peoples nicotine causes as a legal substance makes you beleive > > that, > > thus, the ilegal substances, the some of wich far more > powerfull > > than nicotine, should also be legal... because......? > > > > Not my position here, just pointing out you just gave an > argument > > > > for prohibition as your argument against it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
