From: Terry L Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Boyd, I agree; but, I think a good arrangement to safeguard > the environment of a community is for it to be proprietary. > > Not at all 'radical' is the notion of condominium(sp?) or > so called 'gated' communities. Govt attempts to undermine > private property rights should be repealed. None of this is > to say that *I* endorse any and all things contrived by each > community; but that's freedom. The 'default' position is > reciprocal physical comprehensive autonomy for each person. > > Libertarianism says that if you WANT a certain environment > beyond that to be imposed upon your community, BUY IT!
On the other hand, if I own a piece of property, there is no right of anyone else to dictate what consensual activities I and those on my property engage in. Any attempt to come on my property and stop them is by NAP an act of aggression and I may retaliate to the extent of the violation. BWS ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
