The correct libertarian stance is don't let ANYONE get on welfare; don't let ANYONE collect benefits from the government because there should be none. Immigrants are absolutely NOT a drain on the economy, in fact the exact opposite is true.
--- In [email protected], "terry12622000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Don't allow the immigrants to get welfare or at least ask them to > show an invatation into the country to get the benifits, that is not > against libertarian idea, it is not against the federal constitution, > it is not even against the civil rights act despite what the ACLU may > say but the above is not a federal constitutional issue and the > states should not encourage the federal government to get involved in > immigration except to deny the unconstitutional social security > benefits to the undocumented immigrants but the federal government > should return the social security tax to the undocumented worker and > his employer.--- In [email protected], Cory Nott > <corynott@> wrote: > > > > Not once does Mr. Hosper address the right of association and many > of his other arguments seem flawed. Since I have other issues to deal > with and immigration is not one I need to touch on much as a state > candidate, I don't want to get into it. > > > > He does ask a fair question though - in light of the fact that we > do have a welfare state which likely won't end tomorrow, what do we > do about immigration in the near term? > > > > > > > > > > David Macko <dmacko@> wrote: > > Since last week's demonstrations my last doubts that > > there is no immigration problem have ended. This is an > > invasion problem. I strongly object to having the Libertarian > > Party commit suicide by following your suggestion. > > Steve, ideals are important and we all need them but until the > > damages caused by ninety years of "our" government's treasonous > foreign > > policy > > and a welfare state which attracts parasites are corrected, > > which might be done in sixty or seventy more years if we start > > tomorrow morning. > > In the meantime, here is a rational proposal from our first > > presidential candidate, John Hospers, A Libertarian Argument > > Against Open Borders: > > http://www.mises.org/journals/jls/13_2/13_2_3.pdf > > It has three positive arguments in its favor. > > It does not involve the suicide of the Libertarian Party, > > the United States or our liberty. > > > > For life and liberty, > > David Macko > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
