Are you implying that Quaker society is consistant with your view of 
what Anarchy should be? Quaker's have a very stricht form of 
goverment, further more by virtue of being surrounded by the US, the 
recieved the benifits of the US goverment that I am sure Paul holds 
dear. I am of course obviously not talking about medicaid or social 
security when I say benifits.


--- In [email protected], "hrearden_hr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> 
> 
> There were Quaker colonists in PA during the late 17th century who 
> lived without a state governing them.
> 
>                      $
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected], "Paul" <ptireland@> wrote:
> >
> > How about every attempt at anarchy that has ever been made 
during 
> the
> > entire history of the planet earth?  Is that good enough for 
you? 
> > This of course includes the non-anarchy in iceland that 
anarchists
> > claim was a paradise, and it includes more recent examples of
> > oppression, chaos, murder, rape, theft, and warlords fighting 
each
> > other to control people like Somalia.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], <boyd.w.smith@> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Paul <ptireland@>
> > > > Any form of anarchy refers to the absense of the formal 
> state.  This
> > > > has resulted in brutality, lawlessness, murder, rape, theft,
> > > > oppression, vigilante justice (aka lynch mobs), gang 
warfare, 
> chaos,
> > > > widespread injustice, the strong victimizing the weak, and 
the 
> most
> > > > violent and vicious thugs running things for decades before 
> the people
> > > > finally stand up and form a government (formal state) to 
> protect thier
> > > > freedoms, to protect the weak from the strong, and to offer 
> security
> > > > and tranquility among the population.
> > > 
> > > Really?  And you have evidence of this or an example?  A true
> > example?  And examples of where there was zero initiation of 
force
> > with a formal aggressive state?  Or the existence of a formal
> > aggressive state that did not initiate force or practice theft or
> > restricted liberty arbitrarily?  Name one example of any of 
these 
> that
> > holds up to examination.
> > > 
> > > BWS
> > >
> >
>






ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to