You mean like accurately describing a tariff as not using the
initiation of force?  And for those who smuggle goods across national
borders of initiating force?  And thoroughy proving logically,
reasonably, intelligently, and from a libertarian perspective that not
all taxes are theft, and not all taxes amount to the initiation of
force while disproving every inaccurate, false, and misleading
statement you tried to make to the contrary?



--- In [email protected], <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> From: Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Wrong.  Comparing Christianity to Libertarianism is an absolutely
> > perfect analogy.  Christianity has a set belief system and so does
> > libertarianism.  Christianity has a core belief that separates its
> > belief system from others.  In this case the belief in Jesus of
> > Nazareth.  In the case of Libertarianism it's the believe in and
> > support of the non-aggression principle.  If someone does not
> > believe
> > in the nap, the term "libertarianism" is as inappropriate for them
> > as
> > is "Christianity" for a Satan worshiping. 
> >
> > All paths do not lead to liberty.  Some lead to aggression, and those
> > that lead to aggression always lead away from liberty.  Aggression in
> > the name of liberty is like rape in the name of virginity.
>
> Exactly like supporting tariffs and saying it isn't a tax when it
really is.  And then denying that fact that all taxes are initiated
aggression.
>
> BWS
>








ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian



YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to