In [email protected], "Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You mean like accurately describing a tariff as not using the
> initiation of force? And for those who smuggle goods across
national
> borders of initiating force? And thoroughy proving logically,
> reasonably, intelligently, and from a libertarian perspective that
not
> all taxes are theft, and not all taxes amount to the initiation of
> force while disproving every inaccurate, false, and misleading
> statement you tried to make to the contrary?
>
>
>
> --- In [email protected], <boyd.w.smith@> wrote:
> >
> > From: Paul <ptireland@>
> > > Wrong. Comparing Christianity to Libertarianism is an
absolutely
> > > perfect analogy. Christianity has a set belief system and so
does
> > > libertarianism. Christianity has a core belief that separates
its
> > > belief system from others. In this case the belief in Jesus of
> > > Nazareth. In the case of Libertarianism it's the believe in
and
> > > support of the non-aggression principle. If someone does not
> > > believe
> > > in the nap, the term "libertarianism" is as inappropriate for
them
> > > as
> > > is "Christianity" for a Satan worshiping.
> > >
> > > All paths do not lead to liberty. Some lead to aggression, and
those
> > > that lead to aggression always lead away from liberty.
Aggression in
> > > the name of liberty is like rape in the name of virginity.
> >
> > Exactly like supporting tariffs and saying it isn't a tax when it
> really is. And then denying that fact that all taxes are initiated
> aggression.
> >
> > BWS
> >
>
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
SPONSORED LINKS
| Libertarian | English language | Political parties |
| Online dictionary | American politics |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
