OK. 

BWS

----- Original Message -----
From: Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, April 20, 2006 1:37 am
Subject: [Libertarian] Re: Purity

> [ModeratorNote: to BOTH Paul and Boyd,
>
> This exchange has degenerated to the point of having NO content
> that
> would contribute to an understanding of LIBERTARIANISM  
>
> This tedious repetition of 'You lied'
> followed by  'I did not, but you lied'
>
> is, imo, turning into a bar brawl that the both of you must now
> take 'outside' (of this forum)
>
> Boyd, moderation has been imposed upon Paul for some time now; but
> I'm trusting you to self-moderate in this matter. 
>
>
> -TLP  ]
>
>
>
> Once again, I have not lied at all.  Not one word I've ever said
> on
> this board (or any other) is a lie.  Each and every single thing
> I've
> ever said has been truthful, factual, logical, reasonable, and
> 100%
> libertarian. 
>
> Your neverending stream of baseless accusations, lies, and mudslinging
> toward me don't change this fact. 
>
>
> --- In [email protected], <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Once again you lie.  Totally.  Completely.  Each and every line
> contains a complete and total lie.  That is truly impressive.  Not
> libertarian of course, but impressive.
> >
> > BWS
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 9:47 am
> > Subject: [Libertarian] Re: Purity
> >
> > > You mean like accurately describing a tariff as not using the
> > > initiation of force?  And for those who smuggle goods across
> national> > borders of initiating force?  And thoroughy proving
> logically,> > reasonably, intelligently, and from a libertarian
> perspective that not
> > > all taxes are theft, and not all taxes amount to the
> initiation of
> > > force while disproving every inaccurate, false, and misleading
> > > statement you tried to make to the contrary?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], <boyd.w.smith@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Paul <ptireland@>
> > > > > Wrong.  Comparing Christianity to Libertarianism is an
> absolutely> > > > perfect analogy.  Christianity has a set belief
> system and so
> > > does
> > > > > libertarianism.  Christianity has a core belief that
> separates
> > > its
> > > > > belief system from others.  In this case the belief in
> Jesus of
> > > > > Nazareth.  In the case of Libertarianism it's the believe
> in
> > > and
> > > > > support of the non-aggression principle.  If someone does
> not
> > > > > believe
> > > > > in the nap, the term "libertarianism" is as inappropriate
> for
> > > them
> > > > > as
> > > > > is "Christianity" for a Satan worshiping. 
> > > > >
> > > > > All paths do not lead to liberty.  Some lead to
> aggression,
> > > and those
> > > > > that lead to aggression always lead away from liberty. 
> > > Aggression in
> > > > > the name of liberty is like rape in the name of virginity.
> > > >
> > > > Exactly like supporting tariffs and saying it isn't a tax
> when it
> > > really is.  And then denying that fact that all taxes are
> initiated> > aggression.
> > > >
> > > > BWS
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian 
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>


ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian



YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to