A most revealing history of the Constitution you have been
providing. Trouble is, govt authoritarians could also exploit its
lack of real authority: "no constitution = no rights = no such
thing as unconstitutional legislation".
-Mark
************
{American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote
"not guilty" based on nothing more than a disagreement with the
case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's instructions.
There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" to arrive at a
unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your ground, and fulfill
its other main purpose: to counteract abusive government and
unjust lawsuits.
See www.fija.org
[Please adopt this as your own signature.] }
-----------------------------
_________________________________________________________________
_____
Boyd, nice argument against the substance of Paul's argument. But
that leaves the hysterical portion of his argument - the one that
all
statists fall back on when they find themselves in a
contradictory
mass of tangled logic. "The Constitution says government can levy
tariffs so love it or leave it." This is the second argument we
have
been having with Paul. Nothing logical about it, but it's a
particular version of the fall back position for all (United
State of
Americans, at least) who can't otherwise defend their assault of
liberty.
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
SPONSORED LINKS
| Libertarian | English language | Political parties |
| Online dictionary | American politics |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
