Mark, posseion and use is nine tenths of the law, I think those
living around the Forest may have the most valid claim to the Forest
which would include keeping people out or tresspassing if their cliam
trumps the Federal governments claim and this may include trumping
federal taxpayers claim. I say may because I do not know enough
detail. Here in South East Tennessee we have The Cherokee National
Forest and further up The Great Smoky Mountain National Park. I do
not think the federal government has a valid cliam on either, the
local residence which would include the Eastern Band of the Cherokee
has the most valid claim because of occupancy, use and long
historical cliams and use by ancestors, the Federal government used
eminet domain and various other unjust means to take over the land,
locals have a right to shut down the Smoky Mt. Park and the Cherokee
Forest to outsiders if they want and not admit  the federal
government, Rangers and other federal employees that live on the site
and use the park I think should be included in the valid claim.--- In
[email protected], "mark robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am being deprived of my property rights by the Federal Govt
> (Hoosier National Forest). There is a 40 acre tract of national
> forest land that is landlocked and has no legal access. I want to
> be able to get onto this parcel of public property that I have
> paid taxes for. None of the adjacent landowners allow access from
> theirs. I have complained to more than a few HNF employees and
> they all say I am out of luck; there's nothing they can do. Most
> of them end up asking me why I want to gain access! I am
> scheduled to speak with the next higher-up on Friday. I am ready
> to demand entry to the property or threaten to call the ACLU.
> What would you do?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mark
>

>
> ************
> {American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote
> "not guilty" based on nothing more than a disagreement with the
> case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's instructions.
> There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" to arrive at a
> unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your ground, and fulfill
> its other main purpose: to counteract abusive government and
> unjust lawsuits.
> See www.fija.org 
> [Please adopt this as your own signature.] }
>






ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian



SPONSORED LINKS
Libertarian English language Political parties
Online dictionary American politics


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to