> In the case of abortion, there is no aggression directed at a
> child.
> There is no child to aggress against. A fetus is alive in the same
> way a tumor is alive. Both have human dna cells. Both have the same
> amount of human life....NONE.
The evidence for your premise is not complete and in some cases contradictory. And as everyone here knows (or should know) the only way to have a sound argument is to start with verifiably true premises,apply correct inferences, and then your conclusion will be true. That is it. You can't do that and get a false conclusion. You can't guarantee your conclusion by starting with premises that are not verifiably true or by applying incorrect inferences. Paul's conclusions can only be regarded as possibly true because his premises are possibly true and possibly false. The evidence is not conclusive either way.
BWS
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
SPONSORED LINKS
| Libertarian | English language | Political parties |
| Online dictionary | American politics |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
