aperatus Mark. Rights, are those things that are believed to be ours
with out strings attached. Human seems far more apropriate to me for
discussing rights Mark. Thats why they say "Human rights" Mark.
--- In [email protected], "mark robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> For our purposes, "human" seems more scientific and "person" more
> political. I believe the latter is more accommodating for
> discussing rights.
>
>
>
> ************
> {American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote
> "not guilty" based on nothing more than a disagreement with the
> case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's instructions.
> There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" to arrive at a
> unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your ground, and fulfill
> its other main purpose: to counteract abusive government and
> unjust lawsuits.
> See www.fija.org
> [Please adopt this as your own signature.] }
>
> ------------------
>
> A person is a human, and a human is a person. They are identical
> and
> interchangeable terms. What do you think Human means ... robot?
>
>
>
> --- In [email protected], "Terry L Parker"
> <txliberty@>
> wrote:
> >
> > I object to employing the word 'human' to mean 'person' as the
> issue
> > is already rife with people talking past each other :(
> >
> > -Terry Liberty Parker
> > Please see what I wrote in this forum as
> > 'PERSONHOOD: Abortion & beyond'
> > at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/48100
> >
> >
>
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
