farther back in the process. Why? Because your afraid its to obvious
from what end of your anatomy you are speaking?
--- In [email protected], "Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A zygote is not a human being. It does not posess human life. it
has
> the POTENTIAL for human life, but does not have it. Separate DNA
does
> not amount to human life. A fetus is not a whole human being. A
> whole human being is a fully sentient person and a fetus is not. We
> can use Terry's definition of person if you choose.
>
>
>
> --- In [email protected], "uncoolrabbit" <uncoolrabbit@>
> wrote:
> >
> > A sperm cell is not human life but it has the potential to be, a
> > human egg cell is not human life but it has the potential to be
so.
> > A human fetus is not a piece of one human whole such as your
arm, it
> > is itself a human whole. You would be wiser to cop out and
follow
> > Terry's lead of personhood, as a human fetus is human. If you
sever
> > your arm its self mutilation, suggesting problems that I am not
> > trained to deal with.
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "Paul" <ptireland@> wrote:
> > >
> > > My arm is a human arm. It has human DNA, and it's alive. If
I
> > sever
> > > my arm, have I murdered someone? Human life is different from
any
> > > other. Human life belongs to people (aka persons).
> > >
> > > Here are a list of things that do NOT qualify as HUMAN life.
> > >
> > > A beating heart
> > > A cerebral cortex
> > > A nervous system
> > > Human DNA
> > > Reflexive Actions or response to painful stimuli
> > > Head, Torso, Hands, Feet, Fingers, Toes, Eyes, Ears, Nose, or
Mouth
> > > The shape of a human being
> > >
> > > An acorn is not an oak tree but it has the POTENTIAL to be
one.
> > Dough
> > > is not bread, but it has the POTENTIAL to be. A fetus is not
a
> > human
> > > being but it has the POTENTIAL to be one.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], "uncoolrabbit"
<uncoolrabbit@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On what basis do you feel it apropriate to twist, contort
and
> > > > outright lie about my statements Terry? I attribute HUMANESS
to
> > the
> > > > fetus Terry. The response was to Paul, who does not merely
argue
> > > > that a fetus does not fit a definition of personhood. Paul
> > outright
> > > > claims that a human fetus is not human despite the fact that
it
> > is
> > > > indead a human fetus, not a baboon fetus, not an antelope
fetus
> > not
> > > > anything like that. My post remains below yours to remind
you
> > that
> > > > not once did I use the word Personhood in it.
> > > >
> > > > --- In [email protected], "Terry L Parker"
> > <txliberty@>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On what basis do you assert that the property of
personhood be
> > > > > attributed to a pre-born human individual?
> > > > >
> > > > > Please see what I wrote in this forum as
> > > > > 'PERSONHOOD: Abortion & beyond'
> > > > > at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/48100
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -Terry Liberty Parker
> > > > > http://profiles.yahoo.com/txliberty
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In [email protected], "uncoolrabbit"
> > <uncoolrabbit@>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > A much better statement of yourpoint of view than
recently,
> > but
> > > > > > you "obviously are trying to" strip the human atrribute
from
> > a
> > > > > human
> > > > > > organism, just as the slaver or the fascist before
you. :)
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
SPONSORED LINKS
| Libertarian | English language | Political parties |
| Online dictionary | American politics |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
