For our purposes, "human" seems more scientific and "person" more
political. I believe the latter is more accommodating for
discussing rights.



************
{American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote
"not guilty" based on nothing more than a disagreement with the
case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's instructions.
There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" to arrive at a
unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your ground, and fulfill
its other main purpose: to counteract abusive government and
unjust lawsuits.
See www.fija.org 
[Please adopt this as your own signature.] }

------------------

A person is a human, and a human is a person.  They are identical
and
interchangeable terms.  What do you think Human means ... robot?



--- In [email protected], "Terry L Parker"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I object to employing the word 'human' to mean 'person' as the
issue
> is already rife with people talking past each other  :( 
>
> -Terry Liberty Parker
> Please see what I wrote in this forum as
> 'PERSONHOOD: Abortion & beyond'
> at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/48100 
>
>



ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian



YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to