> Tom, in prior posts you said 'zygotes' are 'human beings' and
> that's 'biology 101' which reasonably implies a broad bio-science
> consensus about the reality described by your statement.
"Consensus" implies a group agreement on a question. There's not
really any "question" for "bio-science" to reach a "consensus" on, any
more than there is for "chemistry" with respect to whether or not a
water molecule -- in solid, liquid or gas form -- is composed of two
hydrogen atoms and an oxygen atom.
A "zygote" is the biological term used to denote one particular form
-- as it happens, the first form -- of human being, as the citations
I've now given you multiple times establish beyond any reasonable doubt.
Which part of "... a human being is initially just one cell, a zygote
..." (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_being#Life_cycle) do you not
understand?
> NOTHING that you submitted as generally respected (meaning that it's
> not a propaganda site) supportive citation contained a phrase posted
> to this forum such as 'zygotes are human beings' You did submit a
> reference to www.L4L.org
So far as I recall, the only time I've mentioned L4L is in stating
that I would NOT use it as a citation source -- and I haven't.
Tom Knapp
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
SPONSORED LINKS
| Libertarian | English language | Political parties |
| Online dictionary | American politics |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
